Sending Mass Emails To Your First Degree Contacts

June 3rd, 2013

I’ve finally gotten around to playing with sending messages to my first degree contacts.  The way I’m doing it now is 50 at a time, through LinkedIn’s mail server.

Simply mouse over the Inbox menu option, then click Compose.  To the right of the To box you’ll see a little non-descript icon… that will pull up your address book.

Unfortunately, you can only send a message to 50 people at a time, so I have to go into my A’s, select the first 50, and then send to them… and repeat the process through all of my network.  It is a pain.  So far, aside from the major inconvenience, I haven’ t had any issues.

Well, there is one almost-glitch.  Sometimes (maybe one out of ten or fifteen tries) I’ll select 50 and then hit okay to go back to the screen below and the To: will be blank.  I wondered if I was actually sending to anyone.  I went to Inbox, then Sent, and saw it indeed sent to those 50 people that I chose, even though it didn’t show them in the To: box.

An alternative (that I used to do, many years ago) is to export your network (only first degree contacts) and then import that into mailchimp, icontact, etc.  But in reality those people have not opted to be on a “newsletter,” so I think one-time messaging is okay but not monthly or regularly messages.  I’m sure that’s up for debate.

linkedin_compose_message

Great place to put keywords on LinkedIn

May 28th, 2013

I haven’t thought about this before… great idea by Meg Guiseppi: Best Kept Secret to Optimize Your LinkedIn Profile

Reminder: Things You Should Be Doing on LinkedIn

May 24th, 2013

I found this post a great reminder, and I was asking myself “am I doing these things?”

The 5 Most Powerful Things you Can Do on LinkedIn You Never Knew

LinkedIn Endorsements continue to get beat up

May 22nd, 2013

From a LinkedIn user: Congratulations! You Have Received a Meaningless Endorsement!

A few people say they like Endorsements.  Most others have the reaction you see from the post above.

Is LinkedIn the Creepiest Social Network?

May 15th, 2013

What a strong title!  It is from Gizmodo: Is LinkedIn the Creepiest Social Network?

The author is wondering where the data comes from for People You May Know and People Also Viewed.

Worth a read…

How to respond to endorsements you get

May 6th, 2013

I got this email from someone on a webinar I recently did:

I often get emails saying that someone I know has endorsed me for a particular skill (the boxes, not a written recommendation).  I’ve wondered if there is etiquette for this situation.  I assume that if you want to use it as a way to connect with that person you have a perfect opening.  If not, should you say thanks?  Honestly, in many cases it isn’t really a meaningful endorsement.

I just delete them.

I don’t think anyone expects a thank you.  It is so easy to give endorsements… and I think you are right: “it isn’t really a meaningful endorsement.”

You are also right with this: “I assume that if you want to use it as a way to connect with that person you have a perfect opening.”

So yeah, if you want to use it as an opportunity to further a relationship, respond.  Otherwise delete the email notification from LinkedIn.

I don’t think you’ll burn bridges.

It is quite different, though, with Recommendations.

Diez Cinco de Mayos…

May 5th, 2013

10 years old.

Happy birthday LinkedIn!

Learnings from Earnings: LinkedIn’s Q1 Reporting

May 3rd, 2013

Check out this post: LinkedIn Stock Dips 10% On Slowing Growth, Even As It Beats Q1 Estimates On Sales of $324.7M; EPS $0.45

I don’t like the stock market. I don’t think it provides real feedback on how a company really does, so the 10% dip doesn’t concern me at all.

Having said that, here is what I got from that post:

  1. LinkedIn soared past the 200M mark and now has over 225M members.  This DOES NOT mean users, it means signups.  I’m guessing a lot (most?) of the new signups are outside of the U.S.
  2. LinkedIn will “earn” more than $1B this year. That is really cool.
  3. They are excited about new features but I’m afraid this will only be a push to get more upgrade money instead of more users and usefulness.
  4. Premium subscriptions for the quarter was $65.6M. I could be totally wrong but I think that means they have 1.1M upgrades.  Here is how I got there.  I am assuming most upgrades are at the bottom end: $20/month.  65.6M divided by 3 months in the quarter = $21.9M per month.  21.9M = $20 monthly upgrade price = about 1.1M people.  One flaw in this rough calculation is that don’t know if the $64.5M figure includes corporate and recruiter upgrades… regardless, 1.1M upgrades on 225M people is less than 1/2 percent, which is what I’ve always heard freemium models do.

That’s my simple takeaway from the TechCrunch post…

LinkedIn Success Story from Dave Mendoza

April 30th, 2013

LinkedIn is obviously a great tool for professionals in transition.  Here’s the terrific story of Eric Pettit. He went from thinking he knew what he was doing in a job search (using job boards) to getting mentoring and having real, amazing results using LinkedIn.

Linkedin As Dream Job Catalyst: Eric Pettit’s “How Personal Branding Enabled MY story”

Congrats to Eric, and thanks to Dave for sharing this on his blog :)

LinkedIn Contacts vs. LinkedIn Policy: Now This Issue Can’t Be Ignored

April 26th, 2013

LinkedIn Contacts is one of the coolest things LinkedIn has released.  They should have done it years ago.  They really should have just acquired JibberJobber years ago, but oh well :)

LinkedIn Contacts is the closest thing to CRM that LinkedIn has released.  It comes from some strategic acquisitions, one directly affecting this new feature (or almost-spinoff) and one that should have but might later.  More info on that at the TechCrunch post.

Aside from the excitement, or the problems, I want to address a problem that no one is talking about.  Let me use the issues of cloud computing (that is, having your data out in the cloud, which means no on your computer… it is on some company’s server that you have no control over) that is brought up on this Huffington Post blog post as well as the original source in this blog post: Dumped! by Google

You can read those but the bottom line is that Tienlon Ho used Google for all of her stuff (Gmail, Google Drive, etc.).  And she did something that Google didn’t like, so they kicked her out.

The issue I want to talk about is not hacking into the server by bad guys, or their technology failing (which happens, but the sites are usually back up in minutes or hours)… I want to talk about POLICY.

In Tienlon’s post she says:

“Google not only reserves the right to take away or vaporize our data for any reason…”

Do you realize that when you use a cloud system you give them permission to…. do what they want with your data or your account?

Listen… there are reasons the cloud is awesome.  You don’t have to worry about YOUR hard drive anymore, which is a pain. I was an IT manager and dealt with failed hard drives, backups, lost data, etc. all the time.  The cloud allows you, a normal person, to essentially have a full IT team providing protection against all that (as well as server updates, upgrades, etc.).  It is awesome.

But it has been vulnerable to things, like hackers and downtime (just like your computer is vulnerable).

Again, the issue I want to talk about is POLICY.

I’m going to share an email I wrote to a few hundred career coaches this morning about this… I hope this simplifies it.

Recently [on that list for career coaches] we’ve seen a thread about getting locked out of your LinkedIn account because of putting titles in the name field on a Profile… right?

That is a POLICY issue.

This week LinkedIn announced Contacts, which is getting closer to good/real CRM (which competes against JibberJobber :) :) ). <– that is my disclaimer

They do some things right with Contacts, some things not so right. The biggest heartburn I would have, though, in recommending it, is their POLICY.

What if you do something against the user agreement and they lock you out for a day or a month or until you beg on your knees for your account back?

I’ve seen this coming for a long time… it is a clash between their policy and your need for data.

If they locked you out of LinkedIn before, it wasn’t the end of the world. It could hurt, sure, but it was mostly a place to find and research… not a place where all of your CRM notes were (including action items, etc.). It was an inconvenience but many could go on without it until it you could resolve it and get back into your account.

Very time sensitive data, though, like phone numbers, email addresses, and dates of follow-up… that is different.

If LinkedIn doesn’t change their POLICY, and they still have a heavy hand on when they will disable accounts, I would never, ever, ever recommend someone store their CRM data there. Why? Because you could lose access to your rich information you’ve gathered because of one of their rules that has to do with social networking, which is different than your private storage of stuff in a CRM.

This is a huge issue.

POLICY.

Many have said this is their playground. Do you like their rules? What do you trust them with?

The cloud issues become more sensitive when the data is more critical.  Lose your Pandora settings?  NO BIG DEAL.  Life will go on.

Lose your entire CRM system that you’ve been putting information in over weeks or months or years?  That is a HUGE issue.  And the current policy isn’t going to cut it.

Now, let’s talk about JibberJobber.  JibberJobber is a cloud-based personal CRM system… so what is the difference?

It is simple.  Because we don’t have to come up with stupid rules (like don’t put something in a field that doesn’t belong there (ie: email address in a name field)), we don’t kick people out for lame violations that they may not have even known they violated.

We don’t have to worry about people spamming Groups and comments and other users because we don’t have those features.  We are more of a pure CRM.

Our POLICY allows you to do stuff you want without worrying about whether you are going to get locked out of the system or not.

In this discussion, that’s the big difference.  We’re still vulnerable to the other cloud issues, but I can comfortably write a post about this POLICY issue knowing that we have that taken care of.

What do you think… are you ready to use LinkedIn Contacts?  Or is that the type of data you really want to have somewhere else, where you aren’t under the heavy dictatorship of whimsical POLICY and repercussions?