<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn hits 45 millions Signups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imonlinkedinnowwhat.com/2009/08/12/linkedin-hits-45-millions-signups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imonlinkedinnowwhat.com/2009/08/12/linkedin-hits-45-millions-signups/</link>
	<description>the blog behind the book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:39:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: reinkefj</title>
		<link>http://imonlinkedinnowwhat.com/2009/08/12/linkedin-hits-45-millions-signups/comment-page-1/#comment-11424</link>
		<dc:creator>reinkefj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imonlinkedinnowwhat.com/?p=502#comment-11424</guid>
		<description>Respectfully, I think the &quot;so what&quot; of the LinkedIn &quot;deadwood&quot; is that there is a significant number of folks -- both on and off linkedIn -- who might be willing to try a &quot;twin&quot; that does some key things differently. A group of odd balls like myself have posited the twin might be labeled “NIDEKNIL”. (A mirror image from Superman&#039;s Bizzaroworld.) The way that LinkedIn treats its paying customers, the groups, and the limits on contacts are all entry point for someone to come in a compete with LinkedIn. No one can conceive of a competitor. Until that competitor &quot;becomes the overnight sucess&quot;. IBM mainframes to the PC. Altavista to Google. AOL to the internet in general. Closed platforms can be blown away by  an open competitor. Lock in the user, like LinkedIn and Facebook, can become their own jail cell. Just the thoughts of another blogger, :-) fjohn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respectfully, I think the &#8220;so what&#8221; of the LinkedIn &#8220;deadwood&#8221; is that there is a significant number of folks &#8212; both on and off linkedIn &#8212; who might be willing to try a &#8220;twin&#8221; that does some key things differently. A group of odd balls like myself have posited the twin might be labeled “NIDEKNIL”. (A mirror image from Superman&#8217;s Bizzaroworld.) The way that LinkedIn treats its paying customers, the groups, and the limits on contacts are all entry point for someone to come in a compete with LinkedIn. No one can conceive of a competitor. Until that competitor &#8220;becomes the overnight sucess&#8221;. IBM mainframes to the PC. Altavista to Google. AOL to the internet in general. Closed platforms can be blown away by  an open competitor. Lock in the user, like LinkedIn and Facebook, can become their own jail cell. Just the thoughts of another blogger, <img src='http://imonlinkedinnowwhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  fjohn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
